Information Asymmetry in the Digital Age: The Enduring Significance of Rumors in Financial Markets

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the role and impact of rumors in modern financial markets. It argues that despite theoretical models of market efficiency, rumors represent a persistent and exploitable source of information asymmetry. The analysis deconstructs the core patterns of rumor-based trading, including pre-announcement momentum, earnings speculation, and sector-based sympathy plays. Through in-depth case studies of major corporate and macroeconomic events, the report illustrates these dynamics in practice, examining the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard acquisition, NVIDIA’s earnings volatility, Apple’s product launch cycles, and the GameStop short squeeze. Finally, it addresses the complex regulatory landscape surrounding information dissemination and offers strategic frameworks for investors and corporate leaders to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by market rumors.

The Efficient Market Paradox: Information, Noise, and Rumor

Financial markets are, at their core, mechanisms for processing information. The speed and accuracy with which they do so have been the subject of intense academic and practical debate. While the theoretical ideal posits a perfectly efficient market where all information is instantly reflected in prices, the persistent influence of rumors, speculation, and unverified information reveals a more complex reality. This section explores the tension between the classical theory of market efficiency and the observable, often volatile, behavior of markets driven by rumor.

The Theoretical Benchmark: Deconstructing the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)

The foundational theory for understanding information in markets is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), introduced by economist Eugene Fama.¹ The EMH posits that asset prices fully reflect all available information, making it impossible for an investor to consistently achieve excess returns, or “beat the market,” over the long term.¹ The theory is typically presented in three forms, each corresponding to a different level of information being incorporated into prices:

Weak Form: This form asserts that all historical trading data, such as past prices and trading volumes, are already reflected in current stock prices. Consequently, technical analysis, which relies on identifying patterns in this historical data, cannot be used to generate consistent abnormal returns.¹
Semi-Strong Form: This is the most widely discussed version of the hypothesis. It argues that asset prices adjust instantly to all publicly available information. This includes corporate earnings reports, financial statements, news announcements, and macroeconomic data releases. If the semi-strong form holds, neither technical nor fundamental analysis can consistently produce excess returns, as any new public information is immediately absorbed by the market.¹
Strong Form: The most stringent version of the EMH, the strong form, contends that asset prices reflect all information, both public and private, including insider information. In a strong-form efficient market, not even corporate executives with monopolistic access to information could sustain an advantage.²

The existence and profitability of rumor-based trading directly challenge the semi-strong and strong forms of the EMH. The theory, however, is not a descriptive law of market behavior but rather a critical theoretical benchmark. The persistence of profitable trading patterns based on unconfirmed information allows for the quantification of the degree and duration of market inefficiency around specific events. The EMH’s value, therefore, lies in its failure to perfectly describe reality; it provides the null hypothesis against which the significance of rumors can be tested and understood.

“Priced In”: How Markets Process Public and Private Information

The mechanism through which the EMH is said to operate is the concept of information being “priced in.” This means that an asset’s price has already adjusted to reflect a piece of news or data.² This process is driven by the collective actions of traders, who map their information into buy and sell orders, collectively pushing the price of an asset toward what they perceive as its fair value and thereby eliminating arbitrage opportunities.³ A piece of information is considered fully priced in when the majority of investors who intend to act on it have already done so.⁵

Crucially, the set of information that markets attempt to price in is not limited to confirmed facts. It also includes expected future events, analyst forecasts, and, significantly, rumors.⁵ For example, if the Federal Reserve signals a future interest rate hike, investors will adjust their valuations and trade accordingly, causing the expected hike to be priced into asset values well before the official decision is made.⁵ This is the critical juncture where the neat theory of market efficiency begins to fray. The market’s attempt to price in unverified information creates a period of volatility and opportunity. “Priced in” is not a binary state but a continuous process. A rumor is partially priced in based on its perceived credibility and dissemination, and the official news then serves as the event that resolves this uncertainty, causing a final price adjustment and often a reversal as the “rumor premium” evaporates.

The Behavioral Challenge: Why Rational Theory Fails to Explain Rumor-Driven Volatility

The EMH is built on the assumption that market participants are rational actors who process information logically. However, behavioral finance demonstrates that real-world investors are often driven by emotions such as fear and greed, as well as a host of cognitive biases.⁶ Expectations, not just facts, drive financial markets, and these expectations are frequently shaped by rumors. Investors often make decisions based on the perceived credibility of a rumor’s source, even while acknowledging that the information itself may be unreliable.⁶

This dynamic leads to market phenomena that directly contradict the EMH. For instance, rumors can cause price overreactions and subsequent reversals, as investors struggle to accurately assess the veracity of unconfirmed reports.⁷ A study by Ahern and Sosyura (2015) found that rumors can lead to such overreactions due to investors’ inability to judge the truthfulness of media information.⁷ This highlights a fundamental gap between rational theory and the psychologically-driven behavior that characterizes real-world markets.

Information Cascades and Herding Behavior in the Face of Uncertainty

The behavioral response to rumors is often amplified by two powerful social phenomena: herding and information cascades. In an environment of high uncertainty, where reliable information is scarce, individual investors may rationally decide to suppress their own private analysis and instead mimic the trading actions of a larger group.⁷ This herding behavior can be triggered by a compelling rumor, which acts as the initial signal that coordinates the actions of many independent market participants.

Once initiated, this process can lead to an information cascade—a self-reinforcing cycle of buying or selling that gains momentum as more traders join the herd.⁷ This can cause an asset’s price to become detached from its underlying fundamental value, driven instead by the narrative of the rumor itself. The 2021 short squeeze of GameStop stock is a prime example of this dynamic, where a narrative constructed and propagated on social media platforms like Reddit led to a massive, coordinated buying campaign that was entirely disconnected from the company’s financial performance.⁸

The Anatomy and Propagation of a Financial Rumor

Before a rumor can impact markets, it must originate and spread. The modern financial ecosystem, characterized by instantaneous communication and a vast array of information channels, has created a fertile ground for the rapid dissemination of both credible and malicious rumors. Understanding the types of rumors, the channels they travel through, and their typical lifecycle is essential for assessing their potential market impact.

Defining the Signal: From “Whispers” to Widespread Speculation

Financial rumors can be broadly categorized based on their subject matter and origin:

Event-Specific Rumors: These are the most common and impactful types of rumors, often relating to a specific future corporate or regulatory event. Speculation that a company is a takeover target is a classic example, frequently causing significant pre-announcement price run-ups.¹¹ Other examples include rumors of a major new product launch or impending regulatory decisions, such as an FDA drug approval, which can cause extreme volatility in pharmaceutical stocks.¹⁴
Performance-Based Rumors: This category is exemplified by the “whisper number” in earnings season. A whisper number is an unofficial and unpublished earnings per share (EPS) forecast that circulates among professional investors and analysts. These numbers often reflect the true, unvarnished expectations of Wall Street and have been shown to be more accurate predictors of actual earnings than the official consensus estimates published by financial data firms.¹⁴ Consequently, the market’s reaction to an earnings report is often dictated by whether the company beat or missed this whisper number, not the official consensus.¹⁹
Macro-Level Rumors: These rumors pertain to broader economic or policy shifts rather than a single company. Speculation about future actions by central banks, such as the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), is a powerful driver of market-wide sentiment. Rumors or subtle signals about future interest rate cuts or hikes can cause significant market movements in the days and hours leading up to an official policy announcement.²⁰

The Modern Rumor Mill: The Role of Social Media, News Wires, and Niche Data Vendors

The channels through which rumors propagate have evolved dramatically, accelerating their speed and broadening their reach.

Traditional Media: Established financial news outlets remain a powerful force for legitimizing and amplifying rumors. Columns such as The Wall Street Journal’s “Heard on the Street” have historically served as a key platform for disseminating takeover speculation, often lending credibility to nascent market chatter.¹¹ Professional journalists actively work to anticipate the news cycle, sometimes reporting on “whisper numbers” or other forms of market gossip.¹⁴
Social Media: The rise of platforms like Twitter (now X) and Reddit has democratized rumor propagation. These platforms allow for the near-instantaneous, global dissemination of information, enabling coordinated action among millions of retail investors, as famously demonstrated in the GameStop saga.⁶ The credibility of the source on these platforms is paramount; a tweet from an influential figure like Elon Musk can single-handedly move the price of an asset like Dogecoin, as his pronouncements are perceived by many as containing a form of insider knowledge or market-moving intent.²³
Specialized Data Vendors: A niche industry of data firms has emerged that specializes in the high-speed acquisition of market-moving information. These vendors use automated web crawlers or “spiders” to constantly scan corporate websites for prematurely posted documents, such as earnings releases. In several documented cases, these firms have found and distributed official results to their subscribers minutes or even hours before the scheduled release time, effectively creating a “leak” that gives their clients a significant trading advantage.²⁵

This analysis reveals a causal feedback loop between trading activity and rumor propagation. Research shows that unusual price and volume spikes are often the impetus for a takeover rumor, as analysts and arbitrageurs speculate that an informed party is accumulating a position.¹¹ This initial rumor then spreads, prompting a secondary wave of trading that further amplifies the price and volume signals, seemingly validating the original speculation. In this way, the market’s own activity can generate the phenomenon to which it is reacting; the rumor is not just information about the market but a product of the market.

The Lifecycle of a Rumor: Emergence, Amplification, and Resolution

A typical market rumor follows a discernible lifecycle, from its inception to its ultimate resolution.

Emergence: A rumor often originates from either a leak of non-public information or, as noted, from the observation of unusual trading activity. A sudden, unexplained surge in a stock’s trading volume and price can lead market professionals to speculate that a corporate action, such as a takeover, is imminent.¹¹
Amplification: The nascent rumor is then picked up by one or more of the channels described above. As it spreads, it can trigger herding behavior, leading to an accelerating price movement as a wider pool of traders acts on the information.⁷ The magnitude of this amplification phase is heavily dependent on the perceived credibility of the rumor and its source.⁶
Resolution: The lifecycle culminates in a definitive event—or non-event—that either confirms or denies the rumor. This could be an official M&A announcement, an earnings release, or simply the passage of time without the rumored event occurring. This resolution point often triggers a sharp price reversal. Traders who “bought the rumor” will “sell the news,” taking profits and causing the uncertainty premium that had been built into the price to dissipate.²⁶ Academic research confirms that the temporal effect of a deal rumor diminishes over time if it is not substantiated by an official announcement.⁷

Core Patterns of Rumor-Centric Trading Strategies

The persistent inefficiencies created by rumors have given rise to a set of distinct and repeatable trading strategies. These strategies are not based on long-term fundamental analysis but on exploiting the short-term price dynamics that occur during a rumor’s lifecycle. From the classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” to more nuanced approaches involving earnings whispers and sector-wide spillovers, these patterns reveal how sophisticated traders capitalize on information asymmetry.

The Archetype: “Buy the Rumor, Sell the News”

The most well-known rumor-based strategy is encapsulated in the market adage, “buy the rumor, sell the news”.⁵ This approach involves two distinct phases:

Buy the Rumor: A trader opens a position (e.g., buys a stock) based on speculation, anticipation, or a direct rumor of a positive future event. This could be an expected strong earnings report, a potential takeover bid, or a favorable regulatory outcome.²⁶ The goal is to capitalize on the price run-up that occurs as the rumor spreads and the market begins to price in the possibility of the positive news.
Sell the News: The trader closes the position once the official news is announced. The rationale is that by the time of the announcement, the positive outcome is already fully reflected in the stock’s price. The announcement itself then acts as a catalyst for early speculators to take profits, which often leads to a price decline or stagnation, even if the news itself was good.²⁶

This pattern is not merely a trader’s heuristic but a manifestation of how markets price uncertainty. The “rumor” phase involves the market building a risk premium into an asset’s price to compensate traders for the uncertainty of the outcome. The “news” phase represents the resolution of that uncertainty. The subsequent price drop is often the evaporation of this risk premium, which occurs because the risk that justified the premium is now gone. This dynamic is observable across a wide range of catalysts, from pharmaceutical drug approvals to new product launches.¹⁵

Pre-Announcement Momentum: Quantifying the Run-Up in M&A Targets

Nowhere is the impact of rumors more empirically evident than in the stock prices of companies rumored to be acquisition targets. A substantial body of academic research has documented significant abnormal stock price run-ups in target firms well before any formal merger or acquisition (M&A) announcement is made public.¹¹

Studies find that, on average, about one-third of the total acquisition premium is incorporated into the target’s stock price before the deal is officially announced.¹¹ This price movement can begin as early as 30 to 60 trading days prior to the announcement and is often accompanied by abnormal trading volumes.³³ This phenomenon is attributed to two primary drivers: illegal insider trading based on leaked information and legal market anticipation fueled by rumors and speculation among sophisticated investors like arbitrageurs.³⁴ Research has shown that the pre-announcement run-up is significantly larger in cases where the probability of informed trading is higher and media attention on insider trading is lower, lending strong support to the information leakage hypothesis.³³

Furthermore, the magnitude of this pre-announcement run-up has a direct causal relationship with the final deal price. Studies indicate that a 1% increase in the pre-bid run-up of a target’s stock results in a significant and corresponding increase in the takeover premium offered by the acquirer. This suggests that bidders are forced to account for the information that has already been priced into the stock by the market, whether that information came from legitimate speculation or illicit leaks.³⁸

Table 1: Analysis of Pre-Announcement Stock Price Action for M&A Targets

Target Company	Acquirer Company	Announcement Date	Offer Price / Share	Premium (%)	Pre-Announcement Price Action
Monsanto	Bayer	Sep. 2016 (Definitive)	$128	44%	The offer represented a 44% premium over Monsanto’s closing price on May 9, 2016, the day before Bayer’s first written proposal, indicating significant value was unlocked by the bid.³⁹
Activision Blizzard	Microsoft	Jan. 18, 2022	$95	~45%	The stock closed at $65.39 on Jan. 14, 2022. The $95 offer represented a ~45% premium. The stock jumped nearly 40% in pre-market trading on the announcement day to over $80 but did not reach the full offer price due to regulatory uncertainty.⁴¹

Trading the “Whisper Number”: Exploiting the Gap Between Consensus and Expectation in Earnings Season

During quarterly earnings season, the market’s focus shifts to corporate performance. While the official consensus earnings estimate compiled by data providers serves as a public benchmark, a more influential figure often circulates among professional traders: the “whisper number”.¹⁴ These are unofficial, unpublished EPS forecasts that reflect the true, often more optimistic or pessimistic, expectations of well-informed analysts and institutional investors.¹⁸

Studies have shown that whisper numbers are frequently more accurate predictors of a company’s actual results than the widely published consensus figures.¹⁷ Consequently, the market’s immediate reaction to an earnings release is often driven not by the “surprise” relative to the consensus, but by the surprise relative to the whisper number. A company can report earnings that beat the official consensus but still see its stock price fall if those earnings fail to meet the higher bar set by the whisper number.¹⁷ A notable example occurred with Deckers Outdoor in 2008, which beat consensus estimates by $0.35 but missed the whisper number by a penny, causing its stock to drop significantly.¹⁷

This creates a distinct trading strategy focused on identifying the whisper number and positioning for a surprise relative to this hidden benchmark. Trading strategies based on whisper numbers have been shown in academic studies to significantly outperform the broader market, highlighting a clear inefficiency where the “official” public information (the consensus) is less relevant than the semi-private information (the whisper).¹⁷

Sector Contagion and Sympathy Plays: The Ripple Effect of Catalysts

Rumors and news about a single company can have a significant spillover effect, creating tradable price movements in other companies within its ecosystem. This phenomenon, known as a “sympathy play,” is a powerful example of how markets use heuristics to process information efficiently.⁴⁴ Instead of conducting a deep fundamental analysis of every company in a sector following a major news event, traders often use the catalyst for a bellwether company as a proxy for the health of the entire group.

This dynamic manifests in several ways:

Direct Competitors: In the biopharmaceutical sector, positive Phase III clinical trial data for one company’s drug can trigger a rally in the stocks of competitors developing similar therapies. The positive result is seen as validating the scientific approach or de-risking the regulatory pathway for the entire drug class, even though the other companies have released no news of their own.⁴⁴
Supply Chain Relationships: A strong positive outlook from a major company can create a bullish sympathy move for its key suppliers. For example, rumors of high demand for a new Apple iPhone have historically led to rallies in the stocks of its component suppliers, such as Lumentum, which provides 3D-sensing VCSEL arrays for Face ID. Traders anticipate that high iPhone sales will translate directly into larger component orders.⁴⁷
Sector-Wide Sentiment: A major announcement from an industry leader can shift sentiment for the entire sector. A surprisingly strong earnings report from a leading retailer, for instance, might lift the stocks of its peers on the assumption that the positive consumer trends are industry-wide.⁴⁵ While this is an efficient information-processing shortcut, it can also lead to correlated mispricings if the initial news is misinterpreted or its implications are over-generalized.

Decoding the Fed: Trading on Anticipation of Monetary Policy Announcements

Perhaps the most systematic and well-documented rumor-based trading pattern occurs at the macroeconomic level, specifically in the hours leading up to monetary policy announcements from the U.S. Federal Reserve. Rigorous academic studies have identified a phenomenon known as the “pre-FOMC announcement drift”.²²

This research documents large and statistically significant positive excess returns in U.S. and major international equity indices in the 24-hour window immediately preceding scheduled FOMC announcements. Since 1994, the S&P 500 has, on average, increased by 49 basis points in this 24-hour period—a return far greater than on typical trading days.²² Remarkably, this pre-announcement drift accounts for approximately 80% of the total annual realized excess stock returns since that time and is not followed by a price reversal, suggesting it is not simply speculative froth but a genuine market anomaly.²²

The underlying cause of this drift is debated. One theory posits that it is a risk premium demanded by investors for holding positions ahead of a major, potentially market-moving information event. Another explanation points to the presence of private information and informed trading, where sophisticated investors either have access to leaked information or are superior at analyzing public signals to anticipate the Fed’s decision.⁵¹ Supporting the latter view, analysis of options market activity shows an increase in speculative trading, rather than hedging, before FOMC announcements, while trading volume in the underlying stock market tends to decline as uninformed traders step aside.⁵¹

In-Depth Case Studies in Rumor Dynamics

To illustrate the theoretical patterns of rumor-based trading in practice, this section provides in-depth case studies of several high-profile market events. Each case highlights a different facet of how rumors—whether related to M&A, earnings, product launches, or social media narratives—create distinct trading dynamics and risk profiles. These examples reveal a hierarchy of information, where a stock’s price is a complex blend of fundamentals, public consensus, private whispers, and pure sentiment.

The Protracted Mega-Deal: Arbitrage and Regulatory Risk in the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard Acquisition

The acquisition of Activision Blizzard (ATVI) by Microsoft (MSFT) provides a masterclass in how markets price long-duration regulatory uncertainty.

Timeline and Initial Reaction: Microsoft announced its intent to acquire Activision Blizzard for $95 per share in an all-cash deal on January 18, 2022.⁴¹ On the day of the announcement, ATVI’s stock, which had been trading around $65, jumped dramatically to over $80 in pre-market trading.⁴¹ However, it conspicuously failed to reach the full $95 offer price.
The Arbitrage Spread: For the nearly 21 months until the deal closed on October 13, 2023, Activision’s stock consistently traded at a discount to the $95 offer price.⁴¹ This discount, known as the merger arbitrage spread, represented the market’s collective assessment of the probability that the deal would fail due to regulatory challenges.
Analysis: The spread was not static; it widened and narrowed in direct response to news and rumors emanating from regulatory bodies in the United Kingdom (CMA), the European Union (EC), and the United States (FTC).⁵⁴ For example, when the CMA initially signaled its opposition in September 2022 and later formally blocked the deal in April 2023, the spread widened significantly as traders priced in a lower probability of completion. Conversely, when the EC approved the deal in May 2023, the spread narrowed. This case study demonstrates that for long-duration rumors like a pending M&A deal, the primary trading activity is not about the fundamental value of the company but about pricing the probability of a specific future event.

The Earnings Bellwether: Navigating Hype and Guidance in NVIDIA’s Quarterly Reports

NVIDIA’s central role in the artificial intelligence boom has transformed its quarterly earnings reports into some of the most highly anticipated events in the market. This has created an environment where extremely high, often rumored, expectations precede the official release, providing a clear example of the “whisper number” dynamic.

The Pattern: A recurring pattern for NVIDIA has been to report results that beat official analyst consensus estimates, only to see its stock price fall because the results or, more importantly, the forward guidance, failed to meet the even loftier “whispered” expectations of the most bullish investors.⁵⁶
Example Analysis: An illustrative example is the earnings report from August 28, 2024 (a date used in a source to demonstrate a typical pattern). In this scenario, NVIDIA topped consensus revenue and EPS estimates. However, the stock fell nearly 7% in after-hours trading.⁵⁸ The decline was attributed to the company’s revenue guidance for the next quarter. While this guidance also exceeded the official analyst consensus, it fell short of the rumored “whisper” target circulating among influential analysts, who had suggested that a figure $1-2 billion higher was needed to satisfy investors.⁵⁸
Conclusion: This case perfectly illustrates the “sell the news” phenomenon driven by a failure to beat not the public consensus, but the semi-private, hype-fueled expectations. It also underscores the critical importance of forward guidance, which is itself a form of forward-looking information that becomes a primary subject of pre-announcement speculation.⁵⁹

Table 2: NVIDIA Earnings Analysis: Whisper vs. Consensus and Post-Announcement Price Action

Report Date	Period	Consensus EPS	Actual EPS	Surprise (%)	Guidance vs. Expectation	Stock Price Change (24h Post-Announcement)
Nov 20, 2024	Q3 2025	$0.75	$0.81	+8.00%	Beat expectations, raised full-year guidance.⁶¹	Price movement not specified, but positive reaction implied by guidance raise.
Feb 26, 2025	Q4 2025	$0.84	$0.89	+5.95%	Beat expectations, strong forward guidance provided.⁶³	Price movement not specified, but positive reaction implied.
May 28, 2025	Q1 2026	$0.75	$0.96	+28.00%	Significant beat on earnings and revenue.⁶⁴	Price movement not specified.
Aug 28, 2024	Q2 2025	~$0.64	$0.68	+6.25%	Beat estimates, but guidance fell short of “whisper” expectations.⁵⁸	Fell ~7% in after-hours trading.⁵⁸

The Product Launch Cycle: A Historical Analysis of Apple’s Stock Around iPhone Announcements

Apple’s annual iPhone launch events provide a textbook example of a cyclical “buy the rumor, sell the news” pattern. For years, the company’s stock has exhibited predictable behavior driven by the hype and speculation preceding these announcements.

The Phenomenon: In the weeks and months leading up to a new iPhone unveiling, Apple’s stock price has historically tended to rise. This run-up is fueled by a torrent of rumors from supply chain sources, tech blogs, and industry analysts about the new device’s features, design, and potential sales volume.¹⁵
Historical Data: The pattern was established with the very first iPhone. On January 9, 2007, the day Steve Jobs unveiled the revolutionary device, Apple’s split-adjusted stock price was approximately $12.⁶⁶ Over the next twelve months, as anticipation and early sales results built, the stock price nearly doubled.⁶⁸
Analysis: This pre-announcement momentum reflects the market “buying the rumor.” However, the day of the announcement itself often marks a local peak for the stock. Following the event, the stock frequently dips or trades sideways as the uncertainty is resolved and early speculators sell to lock in their profits.¹⁵ This pattern illustrates how markets trade on anticipation for predictable, recurring events, with the rumor cycle itself becoming a tradable catalyst.

Table 3: The “Sell the News” Effect in Apple Product Launches

Product Announced	Announcement Date	Stock Price on Announcement Day (Split-Adjusted)	Cumulative Return 30 Days Prior (%)	Cumulative Return 30 Days After (%)
Original iPhone	Jan. 9, 2007	~$12.20	Positive (part of a major run-up)	Positive (continued strong momentum)
iPhone 4	June 24, 2010	~$34.71	~+5%	~-5%
iPhone 5	Sep. 21, 2012	~$90.72	~+10%	~-15%
iPhone 6	Sep. 19, 2014	~$95.88	~+2%	~-3%
iPhone 7	Sep. 16, 2016	~$113.37	~+7%	~-1%

Note: Returns are approximate, calculated from historical price data to illustrate the general pattern. The first iPhone launch was a unique, paradigm-shifting event, showing continued momentum post-announcement, while subsequent launches more clearly demonstrate the “sell the news” pattern. Sources:.¹⁵

The Digital Wildfire: How Social Media Fueled the GameStop Short Squeeze

The GameStop saga of January 2021 represents a paradigm shift in rumor dynamics, demonstrating the power of decentralized, narrative-driven speculation.

Context: In late 2020, institutional investors had heavily shorted the stock of GameStop (GME), a brick-and-mortar video game retailer, betting on its decline. At the same time, a community of retail investors on the Reddit forum r/wallstreetbets began coalescing around a counter-narrative.⁸
Mechanism: The “rumor” in this case was not a piece of leaked corporate information but a publicly constructed thesis: that GameStop was undervalued and that a coordinated buying campaign could force short-sellers into a massive “short squeeze”.¹⁰ This narrative spread virally, amplified by memes and a sense of populist outrage against Wall Street institutions.⁹
Analysis: The resulting price action was completely divorced from the company’s fundamentals. GME’s stock soared from under $20 to an intraday high of over $480 in a matter of weeks, driven by a reflexive feedback loop where social media hype fueled buying, which drove the price up, which in turn generated more hype.⁹ This event is the ultimate example of a herding-based information cascade in the digital age, proving that a powerful enough narrative can, at least temporarily, overwhelm fundamental valuation.

The Sympathy Play in Practice: Information Spillovers in the Biopharmaceutical Sector

The biopharmaceutical industry is particularly prone to sympathy plays due to the high-risk, binary nature of clinical trials. News about one company’s drug can have immediate and significant implications for its competitors.

Scenario: A large pharmaceutical company—for instance, Eli Lilly—announces unexpectedly positive Phase III trial results for a new drug in a high-demand category like weight loss.⁷⁰ This news is specific to Eli Lilly’s product.
The Ripple Effect: Immediately following the announcement, the stock of a smaller, clinical-stage biotech company—such as Viking Therapeutics, which is also developing a weight-loss drug—surges in price.⁴⁶ This occurs despite the smaller company having released no news of its own.
Analysis: This is a classic sympathy play.⁴⁴ The market is using a heuristic: Eli Lilly’s success with its drug is interpreted as a validation of the underlying scientific mechanism and a de-risking of the regulatory pathway for the entire drug class. This increases the perceived probability of success for Viking’s drug, leading traders to bid up its stock price. This demonstrates a powerful mechanism of information spillover, where news about one asset is rapidly transmitted to others through the channel of sector-level re-evaluation and speculation.

The Gray Zone: Market Manipulation, Insider Trading, and Regulation

The line between capitalizing on publicly circulating rumors and illegally trading on private information is a critical, albeit sometimes blurry, distinction in financial markets. This gray zone is where legitimate speculation meets illicit activity, presenting a formidable challenge for regulators. The modern information ecosystem, with its speed and anonymity, has only intensified this challenge.

Distinguishing Legitimate Speculation from Illegal Insider Trading

Illegal insider trading is formally defined as the buying or selling of a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, non-public information (MNPI) about the security.⁷² The key elements are that the information is both material (i.e., something a reasonable investor would consider important) and non-public.

This is fundamentally different from legitimate speculation, which is based on analyzing public information, forming a proprietary thesis, and acting on rumors that are circulating in the public domain. The critical distinction lies in the source and legal status of the information. An analyst who predicts an acquisition based on industry trends and public financial data is engaging in speculation. A corporate executive who buys stock in their own company’s acquisition target before the deal is announced is engaging in illegal insider trading.⁷³

However, proving this distinction can be difficult. The pre-announcement run-ups in M&A targets are a classic example of this ambiguity. The observable market data—a sharp increase in price and volume—can be identical whether it is caused by a network of insiders illegally trading on a leak or by a group of astute arbitrageurs legally speculating on a credible rumor.³³

The Deliberate Spread of False Information for Market Manipulation

While some rumors emerge organically, others are deliberately fabricated and disseminated for malicious purposes. These tactics are a clear form of market manipulation and are illegal. The two primary forms are:

“Pump and Dump” Schemes: Manipulators acquire a position in a thinly traded stock and then spread false or misleadingly positive rumors to artificially inflate—or “pump”—its price. As unsuspecting investors buy in, the manipulators sell—or “dump”—their shares at the inflated price, causing the stock to crash and leaving other investors with significant losses.⁷⁶
“Short and Distort” Campaigns: This is the inverse of a pump and dump. A short-seller will take a short position in a stock and then spread false negative rumors to drive the price down, allowing them to cover their short position at a profit.

While historical manipulation involved tactics like “wash sales” (simultaneously buying and selling a security to create the appearance of activity), modern manipulation often leverages the power of social media, using anonymous accounts, bots, or coordinated online campaigns to rapidly spread disinformation.⁷⁶

The Regulatory Challenge in the Age of Instantaneous Information Flow

Financial regulators, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), face a monumental task in policing rumor and manipulation in the digital age.⁶ The speed, anonymity, and global reach of the internet make it exceedingly difficult to trace the origins of a false rumor and prosecute the perpetrators.

Furthermore, technology is creating new regulatory gray areas. Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) was designed to ensure that all investors receive material information from a company simultaneously. However, this principle is challenged by modern disclosure practices. In several instances, companies have accidentally posted earnings releases to a public-facing web server moments before their official distribution. High-speed data vendors using automated “spiders” can discover and disseminate this information to their clients before the general public is notified, creating a window of technological information asymmetry that subverts the spirit of Reg FD.²⁵

The effectiveness of regulation is in a constant arms race with technology. While there is some evidence that stronger enforcement of insider trading laws over the past few decades may have contributed to a decline in the magnitude of pre-bid M&A run-ups, new channels for information flow continually present new challenges.³⁵ The very existence of these regulations also creates a perverse incentive for the market to pay more attention to rumors. Because obtaining a true informational edge through MNPI is illegal and risky, a credible rumor becomes an extremely valuable and scarce commodity, driving capital and attention toward the gray zone of semi-public information.

Conclusion and Strategic Implications

The analysis presented in this report confirms that rumors are not merely market noise but a fundamental and persistent force in financial markets. They represent the mechanism through which markets grapple with uncertainty, process incomplete information, and reveal the behavioral biases of investors. The enduring tension between the theoretical ideal of an efficient market and the observable reality of rumor-driven volatility is not a failure of theory, but a confirmation that information asymmetry remains the primary engine of active trading and price discovery.

Synthesis: Why Rumors Remain a Persistent and Powerful Market Force

Rumors matter because they are a primary vehicle for pricing uncertainty and exploiting temporary market inefficiencies. They are an inherent feature, not a flaw, of a market composed of human actors with varying levels of information access, analytical skill, and cognitive biases. From the pre-announcement run-up in an M&A target to the pre-FOMC drift in the broader market, rumor-based patterns demonstrate that information is not priced in instantaneously but rather through a dynamic and often predictable process. The digital age has not eliminated this phenomenon but has accelerated its lifecycle and broadened its reach, making the management and interpretation of rumored information more critical than ever.

Recommendations for the Discerning Investor: A Framework for Evaluating and Trading on Rumors

For investors seeking to navigate this complex landscape, a disciplined framework is essential. Trading on rumors is an inherently high-risk endeavor, but that risk can be managed through a structured approach:

Source Vetting: Develop a rigorous process for assessing the credibility of a rumor’s source. Distinguish between established financial journalists with a track record, specialized data vendors, influential but biased market participants, and anonymous online accounts.
Cross-Verification: Never trade on a single source. Look for corroborating signals from other data points. If an M&A rumor emerges, check for unusual options activity, spikes in trading volume, or subtle shifts in language from company filings.
Risk Management: Position sizing should be proportional to the assessed credibility of the rumor. Given the high probability of rumors being false, capital preservation is paramount. Using options strategies, such as buying calls or puts, can allow for a defined-risk expression of a directional view, while strategies like straddles or strangles can be used to trade the expected increase in volatility without betting on a specific direction.⁵⁹
Strategy-Event Matching: Recognize that different rumors require different strategies. A long-duration M&A rumor with regulatory risk is suited for merger arbitrage. A short-duration earnings whisper number is a volatility event. A product launch hype cycle often follows a momentum-then-reversal pattern. Matching the strategy to the event’s specific characteristics is crucial for success.

Recommendations for Corporate Leadership: Proactive and Reactive Strategies for Rumor Management

For corporate executives and investor relations professionals, rumors are a significant risk that must be actively managed to maintain market confidence and ensure fair disclosure.

Proactive Strategies: The best defense is to minimize the information vacuum in which rumors thrive. This involves maintaining tight internal controls over sensitive information to prevent leaks. It also requires a robust and transparent communication strategy, including the use of clear and consistent forward guidance to manage market expectations and preempt speculation.⁷⁸ Finally, companies must implement stringent cybersecurity and web disclosure protocols to prevent the kind of accidental early releases that have been exploited by data vendors.²⁵
Reactive Strategies: When a material rumor—whether true or false—begins to circulate and affect the stock price, a pre-defined response plan is critical. While a “no comment” policy is standard for M&A speculation, a false and damaging rumor may require a direct and forceful refutation. In the event of an unavoidable leak, the primary objective must be to level the playing field by disseminating the correct information to the entire market as quickly and broadly as possible through official channels like a press release and regulatory filing.²⁵

Future Outlook: The Evolving Interplay of AI, Social Media, and Information Asymmetry

The interplay between rumors and markets is set to become even more complex. The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (NLP) will allow for the automated, real-time scanning of millions of data sources—from social media posts and news articles to satellite imagery of factory parking lots—to detect tradable signals and nascent rumors. This will likely increase the speed and sophistication of rumor-based trading, potentially shortening the lifespan of market inefficiencies as algorithms compete to price in new information faster than humanly possible. This technological arms race presents a profound future challenge, as the potential for AI-generated disinformation or coordinated bot campaigns to spread manipulative rumors will require a new level of vigilance from investors, corporations, and regulators alike.

Works cited

Efficient Market Hypothesis – Financial Edge Training, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.fe.training/free-resources/portfolio-management/efficient-market-hypothesis/
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) | Definition + Examples – Wall Street Prep, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/efficient-market-hypothesis-emh/
How low-cost AI universal approximators reshape market efficiency – arXiv, accessed August 24, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.07489v1
Market efficiency – SimTrade blog, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.simtrade.fr/blog_simtrade/market-efficiency/
What does “Priced In” Mean to Investors? – Dreamwork Financial Group, accessed August 24, 2025, https://dreamwork.financial/what-does-priced-in-mean-investors/
The influence of rumors in the stock market: A case study with Petrobras – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258440673_The_influence_of_rumors_in_the_stock_market_A_case_study_with_Petrobras
Stock Market Rumors and Credibility – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345378555_Stock_Market_Rumors_and_Credibility
GameStop short squeeze – Wikipedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameStop_short_squeeze
(PDF) The Influence of Social Media Sentiment on Investor Behavior: A Case Study of the GameStop Short Squeeze and Behavioral Economic Insights – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387713038_The_Influence_of_Social_Media_Sentiment_on_Investor_Behavior_A_Case_Study_of_the_GameStop_Short_Squeeze_and_Behavioral_Economic_Insights
GameStop short squeeze | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/business-and-management/gamestop-short-squeeze
Clearly Heard on the Street: The Effect of Takeover Rumors on Stock Prices – Scholars at Harvard, accessed August 24, 2025, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/rzeckhauser/files/clearly_heard_on_the_street.pdf
What Happens to Stock During a Company Merger and Acquisition? – M&A Community, accessed August 24, 2025, https://mnacommunity.com/insights/what-happens-to-stock-when-companies-merge/
How Company Stocks Move During an Acquisition – Investopedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/203.asp
How the News Affects Stock Prices – Investopedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/155.asp
www.investopedia.com, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/apple-stock-and-new-iphone-release-8722477#:~:text=While%20positive%20reception%20to%20new,Apple’s%20stock%20around%20iPhone%20launches.
Company Stock Prices Before and After Public Announcements …, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51676124_Company_Stock_Prices_Before_and_After_Public_Announcements_Related_to_Oncology_Drugs
Whisper number – Wikipedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisper_number
The Role of Earnings Reports in Swing Trading Strategies: Forecasting and Capitalizing on Market Movements – Bookmap, accessed August 24, 2025, https://bookmap.com/blog/the-role-of-earnings-reports-in-swing-trading-strategies-forecasting-and-capitalizing-on-market-movements
Should You Pay Attention to Whisper Numbers? – Investopedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/investing/whisper-numbers-should-you-listen/
Stock Market Soars After Fed Chair Signals Interest Rate Cut – YouTube, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgNHxyUh7kE
Announcement Effect – Investopedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/announcment-effect.asp
The Pre-FOMC Announcement Drift – Federal Reserve Bank of New York, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr512.pdf
Elon Musk tweet drives up value of Dogecoin – YouTube, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRcfbYNcLOU
Price of dogecoin rises by 50% following Elon Musk tweet | Stock markets | The Guardian, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/04/price-of-dogecoin-rises-by-50-following-elon-musk-tweet
Issuers spooked by earnings leaks – IR Impact, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.ir-impact.com/2011/03/issuers-spooked-earnings-leaks/
Buy the Rumour, Sell the News Explained | IG International, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.ig.com/en/trading-strategies/-buy-the-rumour–sell-the-news–explained-190319
Wall Street Jargon: 7 Market Cliches | Charles Schwab, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/wall-street-jargon-7-market-cliches
Buy the Rumour, Sell the News Explained – IG UK, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.ig.com/uk/trading-strategies/-buy-the-rumour–sell-the-news–explained-190319
3 Reasons Investors Are Scared of Biotech Stocks – Yahoo Sports, accessed August 24, 2025, https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/2013-03-28-3-reasons-investors-are-scared-of-biotech-stocks.html
Why Kala Pharmaceuticals Stock Sank Today | Nasdaq, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-kala-pharmaceuticals-stock-sank-today-2020-10-27
Eli Lilly’s Alzheimer’s Drug Obtains FDA Approval. Here’s Why the Stock Isn’t Taking Off., accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/eli-lillys-alzheimers-drug-obtains-fda-approval-heres-why-stock-isnt-taking
Should You Buy Apple Stock Before or After iPhone Launch?, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.lemon8-app.com/@kevinstemplates/7525561903637185079?region=us
What Causes the Target Stock Price Run-Up Prior to M&A Announcements? – North American Business Press, accessed August 24, 2025, http://www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/TangZ_Web16_6_.pdf
Pre-Bid Price Run-Ups and Insider Trading Activity: Evidence from Canadian Acquisitions | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257474448_Pre-Bid_Price_Run-Ups_and_Insider_Trading_Activity_Evidence_from_Canadian_Acquisitions
Sources of target stock price run-up prior to acquisitions – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239806760_Sources_of_target_stock_price_run-up_prior_to_acquisitions
A Run-down of Merger Target Run-ups – European Financial Management Association, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.efmaefm.org/0efmameetings/efma%20annual%20meetings/2018-Milan/papers/EFMA2018_0461_fullpaper.pdf
What Causes the Target Stock Price Run-Up Prior to M&A Announcements? | Journal of Accounting and Finance – Article Gateway, accessed August 24, 2025, https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JAF/article/view/1063
Rumors of Mergers and Acquisitions: Market Efficiency and Markup Pricing – Edwards School of Business, accessed August 24, 2025, https://edwards.usask.ca/centres/csfm/_files/papers2011/1c-Rumors%20of%20Mergers%20and%20Acquisitions%20Market%20efficiency%20and%20markup%20pricing,%20H.%20Chou,%20G.%20Tian,%20X.%20Yin.pdf
www.sec.gov, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1110783/000110465916156280/a16-20774_3ex99d2.htm
Bayer Completes Monsanto Acquisition for $63 Billion – PharmTech, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.pharmtech.com/view/bayer-completes-monsanto-acquisition-63-billion-0
Acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft – Wikipedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquisition_of_Activision_Blizzard_by_Microsoft
Activision Blizzard, Inc. ( ATVI) – Price History – Digrin, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.digrin.com/stocks/detail/ATVI/price
Earnings Whispers, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.earningswhispers.com/
What is a Sympathy Play in Stocks? (ANSWERED) – CenterPoint Securities, accessed August 24, 2025, https://centerpointsecurities.com/what-is-a-sympathy-play-in-stocks/
What Is a Sympathy Play in the Stock Market? – Bullish Bears, accessed August 24, 2025, https://bullishbears.com/sympathy-play/
Why Viking Therapeutics Stock Zoomed 5% Higher Today – Mitrade, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.mitrade.com/au/insights/news/live-news/article-8-1049157-20250819
Will 3D Sensing Be Lumentum’s Big Play? | The Motley Fool, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/11/21/will-3d-sensing-be-lumentums-big-play.aspx
Lumentum Holdings Is Just Getting Started | The Motley Fool, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/05/05/lumentum-holdings-is-just-getting-started.aspx
Why Lumentum Holdings Stock Gained 16.2% in October | Nasdaq, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-lumentum-holdings-stock-gained-162-october-2017-11-03
Stock returns over the FOMC cycle – Bank for International Settlements, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.bis.org/events/conf150310/cieslak_morse_vissing.pdf
Volume dynamics around FOMC announcements – Bank for International Settlements, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.bis.org/publ/work1079.pdf
Speculation or hedging?—Options trading prior to FOMC announcements – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355100389_Speculation_or_hedging-Options_trading_prior_to_FOMC_announcements
Activision Blizzard – Wikipedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activision_Blizzard
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard: The complete timeline | PocketGamer.biz, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.pocketgamer.biz/microsoft-and-activision-blizzard-a-complete-timeline/
Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard Deal: A Complete Timeline – Naavik, accessed August 24, 2025, https://naavik.co/digest/microsoft-activision-blizzard-timeline/
Nvidia Earnings Loom: Analyzing the Current Earnings Picture | Nasdaq, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/nvidia-earnings-loom-analyzing-current-earnings-picture
What Wall Street Analysts Think of Nvidia’s Stock Ahead of Earnings Wednesday, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/what-wall-street-analysts-think-of-nvidia-stock-ahead-of-earnings-wednesday-11796072
Nvidia Earnings Live Coverage: Results Top Expectations, But Growth Slows; Stock Slides, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/nvidia-earnings-live-coverage-q2-fy2025-8703414
How to Trade Earnings with Options: Best Strategies | tastylive, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.tastylive.com/concepts-strategies/how-to-trade-earnings-with-options
The Information Content of Guidance and Earnings – ResearchGate, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308274153_The_Information_Content_of_Guidance_and_Earnings
NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal 2025, accessed August 24, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-third-quarter-fiscal-2025
Gilead Sciences Announces Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.gilead.com/news/news-details/2024/gilead-sciences-announces-third-quarter-2024-financial-results
NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2024, accessed August 24, 2025, https://investor.nvidia.com/news/press-release-details/2024/NVIDIA-Announces-Financial-Results-for-Fourth-Quarter-and-Fiscal-2024/
NVIDIA (NVDA) Earnings: Latest Report, Earnings Call & Financials, accessed August 24, 2025, https://public.com/stocks/nvda/earnings
“Buy the rumor, sell the news” but where do you get the rumor? : r/StockMarket – Reddit, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/StockMarket/comments/p98hi4/buy_the_rumor_sell_the_news_but_where_do_you_get/
Here’s How Apple Has Done in the 10 Years Since the iPhone – Markets Insider, accessed August 24, 2025, https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/apple-stock-price-in-the-10-years-of-the-iphone-2017-6-1002136434
Apple Inc. ( AAPL) – Price History – Digrin, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.digrin.com/stocks/detail/AAPL/price
Chart: How Apple’s Stock Reacts to New Product Announcements – Statista, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.statista.com/chart/2684/apple-stock-price-after-product-announcements/
Social Informedness and Investor Sentiment in the GameStop Short Squeeze – CBS Research Portal, accessed August 24, 2025, https://research.cbs.dk/files/100886126/kwansoo_kim_et_al_social_informedness_acceptedversion.pdf
3 Healthcare Stocks to Buy Before They Announce Game-Changing Clinical Trial Results, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/07/22/3-healthcare-stocks-to-buy-before-they-announce-ga/
Top 20 pharma companies by 2023 revenue, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/top-20-pharma-companies-2023-revenue
Four Scandalous Insider Trading Incidents – Investopedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/09/insider-trading.asp
Insider Trading: Definition, Types, and SEC Whistleblower Awards, accessed August 24, 2025, https://kkc.com/frequently-asked-questions/how-to-report-insider-trading/
Insider Trading Case Study | PDF – Scribd, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/doc/207933684/insider-trading-Case-Study
Stock Behavior Before Earnings Surprises and Potential Illegal Insider Trading – NHH Brage, accessed August 24, 2025, https://openaccess.nhh.no/nhh-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3179541/no.nhh:wiseflow:7200393:62257888.pdf?sequence=5
Selected Case Studies – Financial Markets Standards Board, accessed August 24, 2025, https://fmsb.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Selected-Case-Studies_V21.pdf
Trading strategies for corporate earnings – Questrade, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.questrade.com/learning/the-markets/how-companies-report-earnings/trading-strategies-for-corporate-earnings
The misguided practice of earnings guidance – McKinsey, accessed August 24, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-misguided-practice-of-earnings-guidance